Nicolas Harmel

654 total citations
10 papers, 531 citations indexed

About

Nicolas Harmel is a scholar working on Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicolas Harmel has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 531 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Insect Science, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Nicolas Harmel's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). Nicolas Harmel is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). Nicolas Harmel collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, France and Germany. Nicolas Harmel's co-authors include Éric Haubruge, Frédéric Francis, Edwin De Pauw, Gabriel Mazzucchelli, Philippe Giordanengo, Marie‐Laure Fauconnier, Patrick du Jardin, François Guillonneau, Anas Cherqui and Sophie Vandermoten and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Experimental Botany and Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Nicolas Harmel

10 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicolas Harmel Belgium 7 454 304 161 114 51 10 531
Yongmo Wang China 11 246 0.5× 236 0.8× 184 1.1× 69 0.6× 41 0.8× 29 393
Lambert H. B. Kanga United States 14 513 1.1× 256 0.8× 178 1.1× 124 1.1× 127 2.5× 41 565
Kaushalya G. Amarasekare United States 13 542 1.2× 255 0.8× 95 0.6× 162 1.4× 22 0.4× 26 598
He‐He Cao China 13 293 0.6× 361 1.2× 91 0.6× 78 0.7× 28 0.5× 25 483
Liang‐De Tang China 13 401 0.9× 272 0.9× 199 1.2× 54 0.5× 39 0.8× 34 463
Roxana L. Minuz Italy 8 195 0.4× 92 0.3× 97 0.6× 86 0.8× 79 1.5× 15 313
María Laura Juárez Argentina 11 452 1.0× 235 0.8× 375 2.3× 79 0.7× 81 1.6× 21 588
E. J. Bernklau United States 15 496 1.1× 230 0.8× 260 1.6× 172 1.5× 127 2.5× 29 587
Sabina Bajda Belgium 13 553 1.2× 184 0.6× 435 2.7× 112 1.0× 29 0.6× 16 633
Hongxu Zhou China 8 245 0.5× 155 0.5× 165 1.0× 57 0.5× 31 0.6× 36 333

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Harmel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Harmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Harmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Harmel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Harmel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Harmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Harmel. The network helps show where Nicolas Harmel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Harmel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Harmel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Harmel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Harmel. Nicolas Harmel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Vandermoten, Sophie, Nicolas Harmel, Gabriel Mazzucchelli, et al.. (2013). Comparative analyses of salivary proteins from three aphid species. Insect Molecular Biology. 23(1). 67–77. 90 indexed citations
2.
Harmel, Nicolas, Éric Haubruge, & Frédéric Francis. (2010). Etude des salives de pucerons : un préalable au développement de nouveaux bio-insecticides. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
4.
Harmel, Nicolas, Anas Cherqui, Philippe Giordanengo, et al.. (2008). Identification of aphid salivary proteins: a proteomic investigation of Myzus persicae. Insect Molecular Biology. 17(2). 165–174. 188 indexed citations
5.
Harmel, Nicolas, Frédéric Francis, Éric Haubruge, & Philippe Giordanengo. (2008). Physiologie des interactions entre pomme de terre et pucerons : vers une nouvelle stratégie de lutte basée sur les systèmes de. Cahiers Agricultures. 17(4). 395–400. 3 indexed citations
6.
Harmel, Nicolas, Raki Almohamad, Marie‐Laure Fauconnier, et al.. (2007). Role of terpenes from aphid‐infested potato on searching and oviposition behavior of Episyrphus balteatus. Insect Science. 14(1). 57–63. 69 indexed citations
7.
Harmel, Nicolas, Pierre Delaplace, Elizabeth Blée, Patrick du Jardin, & Marie‐Laure Fauconnier. (2007). Myzus persicaeSulzer aphid contains oxylipins that originate from phloem sap. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2(1). 31–40. 9 indexed citations
8.
Francis, Frédéric, et al.. (2006). Proteome variations of the Myzus persicae aphid according to host plant change.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège). 13 indexed citations
9.
Francis, Frédéric, et al.. (2006). Proteomics in Myzus persicae: Effect of aphid host plant switch. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 36(3). 219–227. 59 indexed citations
10.
Francis, Frédéric, Nicolas Harmel, Edwin De Pauw, & Éric Haubruge. (2006). Proteomic approach to investigate aphid - plant interactions. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026