Nicolas Gompel

4.6k total citations
55 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Nicolas Gompel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicolas Gompel has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 21 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 19 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Nicolas Gompel's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (22 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (11 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers). Nicolas Gompel is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (22 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (11 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers). Nicolas Gompel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Nicolas Gompel's co-authors include Benjamin Prud’homme, Sean B. Carroll, Victoria A. Kassner, Patricia J. Wittkopp, Thomas M. Williams, Alain Ghysen, Christine Dambly‐Chaudière, John True, Antonis Rokas and Shu‐Dan Yeh and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

Nicolas Gompel

51 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicolas Gompel Germany 24 1.5k 1.2k 842 752 563 55 3.1k
Benjamin Prud’homme France 24 1.7k 1.2× 1.1k 0.9× 674 0.8× 758 1.0× 475 0.8× 32 3.3k
Arnim Jenett France 14 827 0.6× 1000 0.8× 1.9k 2.3× 815 1.1× 310 0.6× 21 2.9k
Michael J. Pankratz Germany 32 1.6k 1.1× 791 0.7× 1.5k 1.7× 322 0.4× 476 0.8× 59 3.3k
Maurice J. Kernan United States 23 1.5k 1.1× 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.5× 468 0.6× 248 0.4× 26 3.1k
Daniel F. Eberl United States 31 1.1k 0.8× 766 0.6× 1.3k 1.5× 584 0.8× 173 0.3× 63 2.5k
Barret D. Pfeiffer United States 23 2.4k 1.6× 1.3k 1.1× 2.6k 3.0× 746 1.0× 326 0.6× 26 4.6k
Africa Couto United Kingdom 8 1.4k 1.0× 765 0.6× 1.9k 2.3× 420 0.6× 453 0.8× 9 3.1k
Maria Monastirioti Greece 18 594 0.4× 1.2k 1.1× 2.2k 2.6× 805 1.1× 860 1.5× 24 2.9k
Kim Kaiser United Kingdom 26 1.7k 1.1× 976 0.8× 2.2k 2.6× 470 0.6× 403 0.7× 51 3.5k
Takeshi Awasaki Japan 26 1.1k 0.8× 613 0.5× 2.0k 2.4× 429 0.6× 287 0.5× 48 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Gompel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Gompel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Gompel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Gompel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Gompel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Gompel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Gompel. The network helps show where Nicolas Gompel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Gompel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Gompel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Gompel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Gompel. Nicolas Gompel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barmina, Olga, et al.. (2024). Entangled and non-modular enhancer sequences producing independent spatial activities. Science Advances. 10(47). eadr9856–eadr9856. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jaenichen, Rita, et al.. (2023). Increased chromatin accessibility promotes the evolution of a transcriptional silencer in Drosophila. Science Advances. 9(7). eade6529–eade6529. 5 indexed citations
4.
Qi, Zhan, Christophe Jung, Peter Bandilla, et al.. (2022). Large‐scale analysis of Drosophila core promoter function using synthetic promoters. Molecular Systems Biology. 18(2). e9816–e9816. 7 indexed citations
5.
David, Jean, et al.. (2021). Resolving between novelty and homology in the rapidly evolving phallus of Drosophila. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 340(2). 182–196. 8 indexed citations
6.
Gompel, Nicolas. (2021). New Mixaderus species from the Mascarene Islands (Coleoptera: Aderidae). Zootaxa. 4969(1). 166174–166174. 1 indexed citations
7.
Poul, Yann Le, Rita Jaenichen, David Hörl, et al.. (2020). Regulatory encoding of quantitative variation in spatial activity of a Drosophila enhancer. Science Advances. 6(49). 19 indexed citations
8.
Bräcker, Lasse B., Christian Schmid, Corinna Dawid, et al.. (2020). A strawberry accession with elevated methyl anthranilate fruit concentration is naturally resistant to the pest fly Drosophila suzukii. PLoS ONE. 15(6). e0234040–e0234040. 9 indexed citations
9.
Poul, Yann Le, et al.. (2020). Ancestral and derived transcriptional enhancers share regulatory sequence and a pleiotropic site affecting chromatin accessibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(34). 20636–20644. 17 indexed citations
10.
Unnerstall, Ulrich, et al.. (2019). ATAC-seq reveals regional differences in enhancer accessibility during the establishment of spatial coordinates in the Drosophila blastoderm. Genome Research. 29(5). 771–783. 36 indexed citations
11.
Bräcker, Lasse B., et al.. (2016). Strawberry Accessions with Reduced Drosophila suzukii Emergence From Fruits. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7. 1880–1880. 13 indexed citations
12.
Manoel, Diogo, et al.. (2013). Emergence and Diversification of Fly Pigmentation Through Evolution of a Gene Regulatory Module. Science. 339(6126). 1423–1426. 117 indexed citations
13.
Cande, Jessica, Benjamin Prud’homme, & Nicolas Gompel. (2012). Smells like evolution: the role of chemoreceptor evolution in behavioral change. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 23(1). 152–158. 45 indexed citations
14.
Carroll, Sean B., Benjamin Prud’homme, & Nicolas Gompel. (2008). Regulating Evolution. Scientific American. 298(5). 60–67. 23 indexed citations
15.
Prud’homme, Benjamin, Nicolas Gompel, Antonis Rokas, et al.. (2006). Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene. Nature. 440(7087). 1050–1053. 364 indexed citations
16.
Dambly‐Chaudière, Christine, et al.. (2003). The lateral line of zebrafish: a model system for the analysis of morphogenesis and neural development in vertebrates. Biology of the Cell. 95(9). 579–587. 74 indexed citations
17.
Gompel, Nicolas & Sean B. Carroll. (2003). Genetic mechanisms and constraints governing the evolution of correlated traits in drosophilid flies. Nature. 424(6951). 931–935. 101 indexed citations
18.
Piry, Sylvain & Nicolas Gompel. (2002). First record of Neoderelomus piriformis (Hoffmann, 1938) from France on Phoenix canariensis Hort., Arecaceae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Derelomini).. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France. 107(5). 529–534. 1 indexed citations
19.
Gompel, Nicolas, et al.. (2002). Les Aderidae de la faune de France (Coleoptera). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N S ). 38(3). 211–238. 5 indexed citations
20.
Gompel, Nicolas, Nicolas Cubedo, Christine Thisse, et al.. (2001). Pattern formation in the lateral line of zebrafish. Mechanisms of Development. 105(1-2). 69–77. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026