Nick Stinnett
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- John DeFrainJames WaltersJames E. MontgomeryM. Lowell EdwardsWilliam C. NicholsSherry TaylorDonna GravesRoger W. Libby
- Topics
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Nick Stinnett
22 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Sociology and Political Science 191
- Clinical Psychology 166
- Demography 149
- Social Psychology 147
- Education 62
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Stinnett
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Stinnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Stinnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Stinnett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Stinnett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Stinnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Stinnett. The network helps show where Nick Stinnett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Stinnett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Stinnett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Stinnett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Stinnett. Nick Stinnett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intimate Relationships, Marriages, and Families | 7 |
| 2 | Secrets of strong families | 131 |
| 3 | Relationships in Marriage and the Family | 20 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Strong families: a national study | 12 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | Family strengths : positive models for family life | 28 |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | Building family strengths : blueprints for action | 25 |
| 12 | Relationships in marriage & family | 4 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 89 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Nick Stinnett
Nick Stinnett is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Demography and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Demography (149 citations) and Clinical Psychology (166 citations). Nick Stinnett has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include John DeFrain, James Walters, James E. Montgomery, M. Lowell Edwards, William C. Nichols, Sherry Taylor, Donna Graves and Roger W. Libby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Family Relations and The Journal of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.