Rachel Baker

3.6k total citations
82 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Rachel Baker is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Baker has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 29 papers in General Health Professions and 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Rachel Baker's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (27 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (23 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (10 papers). Rachel Baker is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (27 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (23 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (10 papers). Rachel Baker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Rachel Baker's co-authors include Cam Donaldson, Helen Mason, June M. Tester, Michael J. Roy, Catherine Panter‐Brick, Susan Kerr, John Wildman, Angela Robinson, Job van Exel and Emily Lancsar and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Baker

76 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Baker United Kingdom 28 913 880 327 299 202 82 2.4k
Sally Redman Australia 36 1.8k 2.0× 406 0.5× 381 1.2× 782 2.6× 266 1.3× 101 3.6k
Lucie Rychetnik Australia 32 1.8k 2.0× 449 0.5× 243 0.7× 697 2.3× 225 1.1× 95 3.4k
James B. Kirby United States 24 856 0.9× 444 0.5× 597 1.8× 297 1.0× 281 1.4× 45 3.8k
François Champagne Canada 31 1.5k 1.7× 440 0.5× 204 0.6× 418 1.4× 182 0.9× 129 2.9k
Evelyne de Leeuw Australia 23 1.0k 1.1× 214 0.2× 172 0.5× 310 1.0× 81 0.4× 112 2.0k
Theo Lorenc United Kingdom 29 2.0k 2.2× 470 0.5× 740 2.3× 649 2.2× 348 1.7× 62 4.5k
Son Nghiem Australia 25 333 0.4× 607 0.7× 231 0.7× 118 0.4× 135 0.7× 139 2.0k
Katherine E. Smith United Kingdom 35 1.5k 1.6× 325 0.4× 453 1.4× 497 1.7× 165 0.8× 115 3.3k
Chris McLeod Canada 24 1.4k 1.5× 279 0.3× 236 0.7× 346 1.2× 151 0.7× 117 2.7k
Bobby Milstein United States 18 1.1k 1.2× 280 0.3× 371 1.1× 325 1.1× 286 1.4× 33 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Baker. The network helps show where Rachel Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Baker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Baker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Baker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Baker. Rachel Baker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McHugh, Neil, et al.. (2024). From polarity to plurality: Perceptions of COVID‐19 and policy measures in England and Scotland. Health Expectations. 27(3). e14069–e14069. 1 indexed citations
3.
Maypilama, Elaine, et al.. (2023). Räl-manapanmirr djämaw - Collaboration in action. 28. 4–17. 1 indexed citations
4.
Jyani, Gaurav, Mayur Trivedi, Sandra Albert, et al.. (2023). Protocol for estimating the willingness-to-pay-based value for a quality-adjusted life year to aid health technology assessment in India: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 13(2). e065591–e065591. 3 indexed citations
5.
McHugh, Neil, Rachel Baker, & Clare Bambra. (2023). Policy actors’ perceptions of public participation to tackle health inequalities in Scotland: a paradox?. International Journal for Equity in Health. 22(1). 57–57. 12 indexed citations
6.
Baker, Rachel, Helen Mason, Neil McHugh, & Cam Donaldson. (2021). Public values and plurality in health priority setting: What to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices. Social Science & Medicine. 277. 113892–113892. 25 indexed citations
7.
McHugh, Neil, José Luis Pinto Prades, Rachel Baker, Helen Mason, & Cam Donaldson. (2019). Exploring the relative value of end of life QALYs: Are the comparators important?. Social Science & Medicine. 245. 112660–112660. 10 indexed citations
8.
Roy, Michael J., Rachel Baker, & Susan Kerr. (2016). Conceptualising the public health role of actors operating outside of formal health systems: The case of social enterprise. Social Science & Medicine. 172. 144–152. 43 indexed citations
9.
McHugh, Neil, Rachel Baker, Helen Mason, et al.. (2015). Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics. 16(1). 14–14. 27 indexed citations
10.
Prades, José Luis Pinto, Fernando Ignacio Sánchez Martínez, Belén Corbacho, & Rachel Baker. (2014). Valuing QALYs at the end of life. Social Science & Medicine. 113. 5–14. 45 indexed citations
11.
Pennington, Mark, Rachel Baker, Werner Brouwer, et al.. (2013). Comparing WTP Values of Different Types of QALY Gain Elicited from the General Public. Health Economics. 24(3). 280–293. 62 indexed citations
12.
Petrou, Stavros, Ngianga‐Bakwin Kandala, Angela Robinson, & Rachel Baker. (2013). A Person Trade-Off Study to Estimate Age-Related Weights for Health Gains in Economic Evaluation. PharmacoEconomics. 31(10). 893–907. 22 indexed citations
13.
Baker, Rachel, Anna Bartczak, Susan Chilton, & Hugh Metcalf. (2013). Did people “buy” what was “sold”? A qualitative evaluation of a contingent valuation survey information set for gains in life expectancy. Journal of Environmental Management. 133. 94–103. 4 indexed citations
14.
Baker, Rachel, Ian J. Bateman, Cam Donaldson, et al.. (2010). Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project. Health Technology Assessment. 14(27). 1–162. 219 indexed citations
15.
Baker, Rachel, et al.. (2008). Q methodology in nursing research. ResearchOnline. 19(5). 368–368. 2 indexed citations
16.
Mason, Helen, Rachel Baker, & Cam Donaldson. (2008). Willingness to pay for a QALY: past, present and future. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 8(6). 575–582. 30 indexed citations
17.
Bonetti, Debbie, Martin Eccles, Marie Johnston, et al.. (2004). Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial. Social Science & Medicine. 60(9). 2135–2147. 83 indexed citations
18.
Baker, Rachel & Angela Robinson. (2003). Responses to standard gambles: are preferences ‘well constructed’?. Health Economics. 13(1). 37–48. 34 indexed citations
19.
Lipworth, Brian J., et al.. (1998). Effects of Treatment with Formoterol on Bronchoprotection against Methacholine. The American Journal of Medicine. 104(5). 431–438. 83 indexed citations
20.
Panter‐Brick, Catherine, et al.. (1996). Comparative study of flex heart rate in three samples of Nepali boys. American Journal of Human Biology. 8(5). 653–660. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026