Nick Sireau
About
In The Last Decade
Nick Sireau
4 papers receiving 55 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Clinical Psychology 47
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 15
- Cognitive Neuroscience 12
- Psychiatry and Mental health 6
- Social Psychology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Sireau
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Sireau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Sireau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Sireau more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Sireau
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Sireau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Sireau. The network helps show where Nick Sireau may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Sireau
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Sireau. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Sireau based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Sireau. Nick Sireau is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Microfranchising: How Social Entrepreneurs are Building a New Road to Development | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.