Nick L. Occleston
- Rehabilitation top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peng T. KhawSharon O’KaneMark W. J. FergusonChee KonG. William AylwardHugh LavertyJulie T. DanielsGregory S. Schultz
- Topics
- Wound Healing and Treatments (12 papers)Dermatologic Treatments and Research (9 papers)Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Nick L. Occleston
23 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Rehabilitation 459
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 447
- Ophthalmology 410
- Molecular Biology 342
- Surgery 286
Countries citing papers authored by Nick L. Occleston
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick L. Occleston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick L. Occleston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick L. Occleston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick L. Occleston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick L. Occleston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick L. Occleston. The network helps show where Nick L. Occleston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick L. Occleston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick L. Occleston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick L. Occleston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick L. Occleston. Nick L. Occleston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 215 | |
| 6 | 84 | |
| 7 | 71 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 111 | |
| 11 | Expression of vitreous cytokines in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a prospective study. | 157 |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | A prospective study of matrix metalloproteinases in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. | 84 |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | Single exposures to antiproliferatives: long-term effects on ocular fibroblast wound-healing behavior. | 109 |
| 18 | 148 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Effects of single exposures to antiproliferative agents on ocular fibroblast-mediated collagen contraction. | 58 |
About Nick L. Occleston
Nick L. Occleston is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Dermatology and Ophthalmology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (12 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (9 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (459 citations), Ophthalmology (410 citations) and Dermatology (249 citations). Nick L. Occleston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Peng T. Khaw, Sharon O’Kane, Mark W. J. Ferguson, Chee Kon, G. William Aylward, Hugh Laverty, Julie T. Daniels, Gregory S. Schultz, G. Larkin and Ian Grierson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, American Journal Of Pathology and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.