Nick Fläschner
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- K. SengstockChristof WeitenbergMatthias TarnowskiBenno S. RemDirk-Sören LühmannDominik VogelC. R. BeckerLudwig Mathey
- Topics
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (9 papers)Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers)Quantum many-body systems (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsCondensed Matter PhysicsStatistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Nick Fläschner
12 papers receiving 974 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 926
- Condensed Matter Physics 211
- Artificial Intelligence 153
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 125
- Materials Chemistry 95
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Fläschner
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Fläschner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Fläschner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Fläschner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Fläschner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Fläschner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Fläschner. The network helps show where Nick Fläschner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Fläschner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Fläschner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Fläschner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Fläschner. Nick Fläschner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 141 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topologybreakdown → | 262 |
| 8 | Experimental reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch bandbreakdown → | 346 |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 66 | |
| 13 | 56 |
About Nick Fläschner
Nick Fläschner is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (9 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (926 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (211 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (125 citations). Nick Fläschner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include K. Sengstock, Christof Weitenberg, Matthias Tarnowski, Benno S. Rem, Dirk-Sören Lühmann, Dominik Vogel, C. R. Becker, Ludwig Mathey, Jan Carl Budich and Markus Heyl. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.