Nick Cullen
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Rheumatology
- Co-authors
- Dishan SinghAndy GoldbergMatthew WelckKaran MalhotraShelain PatelJill DawsonRobert SharpPaul Cooke
- Topics
- Foot and Ankle Surgery (8 papers)Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers)Tendon Structure and Treatment (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Bone and Joint SurgeryFoot & Ankle International
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIsraelUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nick Cullen
14 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 215
- Surgery 152
- Biomedical Engineering 74
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 28
- Rheumatology 24
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Cullen
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Cullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Cullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Cullen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Cullen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Cullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Cullen. The network helps show where Nick Cullen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Cullen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Cullen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Cullen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Cullen. Nick Cullen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | A REVIEW OF ORTHOTIC DESIGN, PATIENT COMPLIANCE AND SATISFACTION IN AN NHS OUTPATIENT SERVICE | 1 |
| 15 | TALECTOMY AND TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS IN COMPLEX HINDFOOT RECONSTRUCTION: THE TIBIONAVICULAR ARTICULATION | 1 |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Nick Cullen
Nick Cullen is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental Biology and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (8 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (215 citations), Surgery (152 citations) and Rehabilitation (17 citations). Nick Cullen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dishan Singh, Andy Goldberg, Matthew Welck, Karan Malhotra, Shelain Patel, Jill Dawson, Robert Sharp, Paul Cooke, Alex J. MacGregor and Razi Zaidi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Foot & Ankle International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.