Nick Craddock
Impact in
-
- Migraine and Headache Studies
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Papers in
-
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 2
- Genetics 3
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 3
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2
- Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting 1
- Co-authors
- Ian Rees Jones (2 shared papers)Peter McGuffin (1 shared paper)Lisa Jones (2 shared papers)Mike Owen (2 shared papers)Ania Korszun (1 shared paper)Zainab Samaan (1 shared paper)Anne Farmer (1 shared paper)Liz Forty (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Medicine (2 papers)World Psychiatry (1 paper)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Behavior Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Nick Craddock
6 papers receiving 112 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Psychiatry and Mental health 71
- Biological Psychiatry 8
- Behavioral Neuroscience 8
- Clinical Psychology 26
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Craddock
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Craddock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Craddock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Craddock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Craddock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Craddock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Craddock. The network helps show where Nick Craddock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Nick Craddock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 3 |
About Nick Craddock
Nick Craddock is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 118 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper), Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (71 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (26 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (13 citations). Nick Craddock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Ian Rees Jones, Peter McGuffin, Lisa Jones, Mike Owen, Peter McGuffin, Ania Korszun, Zainab Samaan, Anne Farmer, Liz Forty and Sayeed Haque. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Medicine, World Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Behavior Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.