Nick C. Polfer
- Spectroscopy top 0.1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 1%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jos OomensRobert C. DunbarBéla PaizsSándor SuhaiGert von HeldenGerard MeijerDavid T. MooreJeffrey D. Steill
- Topics
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (37 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (20 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyChemical Society ReviewsJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Nick C. Polfer
49 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Spectroscopy 3.0k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 951
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 440
- Organic Chemistry 346
Countries citing papers authored by Nick C. Polfer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick C. Polfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick C. Polfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick C. Polfer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick C. Polfer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick C. Polfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick C. Polfer. The network helps show where Nick C. Polfer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick C. Polfer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick C. Polfer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick C. Polfer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick C. Polfer. Nick C. Polfer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 257 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | Vibrational spectroscopy of bare and solvated ionic complexes of biological relevancebreakdown → | 373 |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 98 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 110 | |
| 12 | 208 | |
| 13 | 198 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 157 | |
| 16 | 144 | |
| 17 | 138 | |
| 18 | 230 | |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | Letter : the diagnostic value of amino acid side-chain losses in electron capture dissociation of polypeptides. Comment on: | 10 |
About Nick C. Polfer
Nick C. Polfer is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (37 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (20 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (3.0k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (440 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations). Nick C. Polfer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jos Oomens, Robert C. Dunbar, Béla Paizs, Sándor Suhai, Gert von Helden, Gerard Meijer, David T. Moore, Jeffrey D. Steill, John R. Eyler and Matthew W. Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Society Reviews and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.