Kevin C. Cossel
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 1%
- Spectroscopy top 0.5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jun YeFlorian AdlerNathan R. NewburyMichael J. ThorpeIan CoddingtonIngmar HartlFabrizio R. GiorgettaEric Cornell
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (42 papers)Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (37 papers)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Kevin C. Cossel
66 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.9k
- Spectroscopy 1.3k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.0k
- Global and Planetary Change 254
- Atmospheric Science 250
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin C. Cossel
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin C. Cossel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin C. Cossel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin C. Cossel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin C. Cossel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin C. Cossel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin C. Cossel. The network helps show where Kevin C. Cossel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin C. Cossel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin C. Cossel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin C. Cossel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin C. Cossel. Kevin C. Cossel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | Experimental constraint on axion-like particle coupling over seven orders of magnitude in mass | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 244 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | APPLICATIONS OF CAVITY-ENHANCED DIRECT FREQUENCY COMB SPECTROSCOPY | 1 |
| 18 | 202 | |
| 19 | 214 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Kevin C. Cossel
Kevin C. Cossel is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (42 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (37 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (1.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.9k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.0k citations). Kevin C. Cossel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jun Ye, Florian Adler, Nathan R. Newbury, Michael J. Thorpe, Ian Coddington, Ingmar Hartl, Fabrizio R. Giorgetta, Eric Cornell, Eleanor M. Waxman and M. Grau. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.