Nick Bisley

573 citations
39 papers · 269 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Bisley

34 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Nick Bisley
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Development 62
  • Political Science and International Relations 183
  • General Energy 5
  • Demography 57
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 27
Replace Mohan Malik with:
Mohan Malik United States
Alan Chong Singapore
Alyson J. K. Bailes Iceland
Kei Koga Singapore
Derek McDougall Australia
Linda Jakobson Finland
Thomas S. Wilkins Australia
Zack Cooper United States
Stein Tønnesson Norway
Kuik Cheng-Chwee
Nick Bisley relative to Mohan Malik United States Mohan Malik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Mohan Malik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Bisley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Bisley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Bisley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Bisley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Bisley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Bisley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Bisley. The network helps show where Nick Bisley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Bisley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Bisley Line = papers co-authored together Nick Bisley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201322
2 201222
3 200319
4 200719
5 201317
6 200815
7 201814
8
Building Asia’s Security
201011
9 201810
10 201810
11 201210
12 20119
13 20088
14 20048
15 20246
16 20156
17
Conflict in the East China Sea: Would ANZUS Apply?
20146
18 20116
19 20016
20 20226

About Nick Bisley

Nick Bisley is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development, Demography, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (14 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (8 papers), International Development and Aid (8 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (5 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (62 citations), Political Science and International Relations (183 citations), General Energy (5 citations), Demography (57 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (27 citations). Nick Bisley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Phillips, Benjamin Schreer, Brendan Taylor, Ashley J. Tellis, George Lawson, Mark Beeson, Robyn Eckersley, Shahar Hameiri, Benjamin Zala and Katrina Lee‐Koo. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal Of International Affairs, Contemporary Southeast Asia, International Politics, Australian Journal of Politics & History and Asian Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact