Nicholas Thompson
About
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Thompson
7 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Clinical Psychology 152
- Neurology 78
- Epidemiology 62
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 36
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Thompson
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Thompson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Thompson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Thompson. The network helps show where Nicholas Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Thompson. Nicholas Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 178 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | Developing Conditions of Trust within a Framework of Trust | 2 |
| 6 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.