Nicholas Pinter

3.7k total citations
84 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Nicholas Pinter is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas Pinter has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 31 papers in Ecology and 27 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Nicholas Pinter's work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management (29 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (26 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (26 papers). Nicholas Pinter is often cited by papers focused on Flood Risk Assessment and Management (29 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (26 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (26 papers). Nicholas Pinter collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Nicholas Pinter's co-authors include Jonathan W.F. Remo, Reuben A. Heine, Rienk R. van der Ploeg, Scott E. Ishman, Brian S. Ickes, R. Scott Anderson, Andrew C. Scott, Carolyn Kousky, Oliver Wing and Paul Bates and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas Pinter

82 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicholas Pinter United States 31 1.2k 797 769 748 484 84 2.7k
Daniel Brunstein France 29 430 0.4× 1.2k 1.5× 470 0.6× 143 0.2× 289 0.6× 57 2.0k
Vishwas S. Kale India 25 804 0.7× 967 1.2× 626 0.8× 476 0.6× 199 0.4× 58 2.0k
Olav Slaymaker Canada 28 473 0.4× 1.5k 1.9× 1.1k 1.4× 604 0.8× 139 0.3× 107 3.1k
Varyl R. Thorndycraft United Kingdom 25 739 0.6× 1.5k 1.8× 803 1.0× 517 0.7× 132 0.3× 55 2.5k
John F. Shroder United States 29 550 0.5× 2.5k 3.2× 384 0.5× 212 0.3× 701 1.4× 75 3.8k
John D. Lenters United States 32 2.5k 2.2× 1.7k 2.1× 848 1.1× 1.6k 2.2× 70 0.1× 64 4.8k
Stephen Tooth United Kingdom 33 771 0.7× 1.2k 1.5× 2.0k 2.6× 727 1.0× 145 0.3× 100 3.5k
Stephan Harrison United Kingdom 41 711 0.6× 4.5k 5.7× 616 0.8× 291 0.4× 197 0.4× 160 5.7k
Nick Drake United Kingdom 38 1.0k 0.9× 1.8k 2.2× 945 1.2× 219 0.3× 188 0.4× 99 4.5k
Bernard Francou France 34 1.1k 0.9× 3.0k 3.8× 484 0.6× 407 0.5× 111 0.2× 113 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Pinter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Pinter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Pinter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Pinter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Pinter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Pinter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Pinter. The network helps show where Nicholas Pinter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Pinter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Pinter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Pinter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Pinter. Nicholas Pinter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gourevitch, Jesse D. & Nicholas Pinter. (2023). Federal incentives for community-level climate adaptation: an evaluation of FEMA’s Community Rating System. Environmental Research Letters. 18(3). 34037–34037. 5 indexed citations
2.
Wing, Oliver, Nicholas Pinter, Paul Bates, & Carolyn Kousky. (2020). New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data. Nature Communications. 11(1). 1444–1444. 154 indexed citations
3.
Snyder, George L. & Nicholas Pinter. (2018). SUBMERGED PALEO-SHORELINES OF THE CALIFORNIA CONTINENTAL BORDERLAND: TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF HYDRO-ISOSTATIC ADJUSTMENT. Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2017). Mitigating Flood Risk and Climate Change Impacts Through Managed Retreat. 1 indexed citations
5.
Phillion, A.B., Miha Založnik, Nicholas Pinter, et al.. (2017). Evolution of a mushy zone in a static temperature gradient using a volume average approach. Acta Materialia. 141. 206–216. 22 indexed citations
6.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2016). Modeling residual flood risk behind levees, Upper Mississippi River, USA. Environmental Science & Policy. 58. 131–140. 34 indexed citations
7.
Pinter, Nicholas. (2015). Discussion of "Analysis of the Impacts of Dikes on Flood Stages in the Middle Mississippi River". 141(9).
8.
Scott, Andrew C., Mark Hardiman, Nicholas Pinter, & R. Scott Anderson. (2011). Evidence of fire regimes in the Pleistocene of the California Islands. Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia). 11(11). 59–60. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bormann, Helge, et al.. (2011). Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: Flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages. Journal of Hydrology. 404(1-2). 50–66. 65 indexed citations
10.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2008). Flood trends and river engineering on the Mississippi River system. Geophysical Research Letters. 35(23). 95 indexed citations
11.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2008). Hydrologic history of the Mississippi and Lower Missouri Rivers based upon a refined specific‐gauge approach. Hydrological Processes. 22(22). 4436–4447. 29 indexed citations
12.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2006). Trends in flood stages: Contrasting results from the Mississippi and Rhine River systems. Journal of Hydrology. 331(3-4). 554–566. 63 indexed citations
13.
Ishman, Scott E., et al.. (2003). Late Cenozoic Evolution of the Mejillones Peninsula, Northern Chile. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2003. 5 indexed citations
14.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2003). Engineering modifications and changes in flood behavior of the middle Mississippi River.. 96–114. 1 indexed citations
15.
Pinter, Nicholas. (2003). Fault-related fold growth and isostatic subsidence, California Channel Islands. American Journal of Science. 303(4). 300–318. 34 indexed citations
16.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (2002). Reply [to “Comment on ‘Assessing flood hazard on dynamic rivers’”]. Eos. 83(36). 397–398. 10 indexed citations
17.
Pinter, Nicholas, et al.. (1998). Plio‐Pleistocene Ash Falls, Sedimentation, and Range‐Front Faulting Along the White‐Inyo Mountains Front, California. The Journal of Geology. 106(4). 511–522. 19 indexed citations
18.
Pinter, Nicholas. (1996). Exercises in active tectonics : an introduction to earthquakes and tectonic geomorphology. Prentice Hall eBooks. 3 indexed citations
19.
Pinter, Nicholas. (1995). Faulting on the Volcanic Tableland, Owens Valley, California. The Journal of Geology. 103(1). 73–83. 26 indexed citations
20.
Gardner, Thomas W., Nicholas Pinter, Rudy Slingerland, et al.. (1992). Quaternary uplift astride the aseismic Cocos Ridge, Pacific coast, Costa Rica. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 104(2). 219–232. 138 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026