Nicholas Mirzoeff
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 0.5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 1%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 1%
- Co-authors
- Gregory SholetteJack HalberstamSuzanne Preston BlierFernando Domínguez RubioDan HicksG. Hussein RassoolHaidy GeismarAna Lucia Araújo
- Topics
- Visual Culture and Art Theory (7 papers)Photography and Visual Culture (5 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Historical ReviewPublic Culture
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaCanada
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Mirzoeff
43 papers receiving 770 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Sociology and Political Science 475
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 210
- Geography, Planning and Development 150
- Literature and Literary Theory 127
- History 115
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Mirzoeff
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Mirzoeff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Mirzoeff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Mirzoeff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Mirzoeff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Mirzoeff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Mirzoeff. The network helps show where Nicholas Mirzoeff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Mirzoeff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Mirzoeff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Mirzoeff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Mirzoeff. Nicholas Mirzoeff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 183 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Watching Babylon: The War in Iraq and Global Visual Culture | 83 |
| 17 | Una introducción a la cultura visual | 37 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Nicholas Mirzoeff
Nicholas Mirzoeff is a scholar working on Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and History, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual Culture and Art Theory (7 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (5 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (210 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (150 citations) and Museology (86 citations). Nicholas Mirzoeff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Sholette, Jack Halberstam, Suzanne Preston Blier, Fernando Domínguez Rubio, Dan Hicks, G. Hussein Rassool, Haidy Geismar and Ana Lucia Araújo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and Public Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.