Nicholas Gane

2.3k citations
53 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Gane

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Nicholas Gane
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Geography, Planning and Development 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 628
  • Urban Studies 78
  • Communication 73
  • Finance 96
Replace Mark Fisher with:
Mark Fisher United States
Tom Conley United States
Mary Poovey United States
Alain Badiou France
Sylvère Lotringer United States
Johan Heilbron France
Maurizio Lazzarato France
Stephen Kalberg United States
Rodney Livingstone United Kingdom
Charles Levin United States
Nicholas Gane relative to Mark Fisher United States Mark Fisher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mark Fisher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Gane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Gane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Gane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Gane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Gane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Gane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Gane. The network helps show where Nicholas Gane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Gane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Gane Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Gane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995181
2 2006137
3 201297
4 200695
5 202177
6 201360
7 201440
8
New Media: The Key Concepts
200838
9 200634
10 200529
11 201226
12 200926
13 200525
14 201123
15 200221
16 200321
17 200719
18 201218
19 199718
20 200318

About Nicholas Gane

Nicholas Gane is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Cultural Studies, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (11 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (5 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (5 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (94 citations), Sociology and Political Science (628 citations), Urban Studies (78 citations), Communication (73 citations) and Finance (96 citations). Nicholas Gane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roy Porter, Colin Jones, Roger Burrows, William Davies, David Beer, Robert J. Antonio, Les Back, Geoffrey Winthrop‐Young, Peter J. Taylor and Bryan S. Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Theory Culture & Society, Sociology, Information Communication & Society, British Journal of Sociology and Acta Sociologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact