Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Innes C. CuthillRoland BaddeleyMark A. GeorgesonWilliam L. AllenSami MerilaitaJeffrey M. BrunstromNicholas G. ShakeshaftJames B. Barnett
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction (34 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (34 papers)Plant and animal studies (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaFinland
In The Last Decade
Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel
77 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 643
- Social Psychology 362
- Global and Planetary Change 342
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 339
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel. The network helps show where Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel. Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 91 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel
Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (34 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (34 papers) and Plant and animal studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Sensory Systems (247 citations) and Developmental Biology (73 citations). Nicholas E. Scott‐Samuel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Innes C. Cuthill, Roland Baddeley, Mark A. Georgeson, William L. Allen, Sami Merilaita, Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, Nicholas G. Shakeshaft, James B. Barnett, Joanna R. Hall and Benedict G. Hogan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.