Nicholas C. Spies
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Oncology
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Obi L. GriffithMalachi GriffithAdam CoffmanAlex H. WagnerYang-Yang FengSusanna KiwalaGregory C. SpiesKelsy C. Cotto
- Topics
- Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (10 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers)Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers)
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids ResearchClinical Cancer ResearchAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Nicholas C. Spies
24 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Molecular Biology 618
- Cancer Research 222
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 191
- Oncology 152
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 135
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas C. Spies
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas C. Spies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas C. Spies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas C. Spies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas C. Spies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas C. Spies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas C. Spies. The network helps show where Nicholas C. Spies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas C. Spies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas C. Spies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas C. Spies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas C. Spies. Nicholas C. Spies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | DGIdb 3.0: a redesign and expansion of the drug–gene interaction databasebreakdown → | 551 |
| 19 | 77 | |
| 20 | 262 |
About Nicholas C. Spies
Nicholas C. Spies is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Family Practice, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (10 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (29 citations), Cancer Research (222 citations) and Molecular Biology (618 citations). Nicholas C. Spies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Griffith, Adam Coffman, Alex H. Wagner, Yang-Yang Feng, Susanna Kiwala, Gregory C. Spies, Kelsy C. Cotto, Jason Walker and Benjamin J. Ainscough. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Clinical Cancer Research and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.