Ngoc Jade Thai
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stefano SeriOlivia LongeAntonella CerquigliniGina RipponCarl SeniorGeorgina RussellMarcus R. MunafòJ.C. Brooks
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers)Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Ngoc Jade Thai
33 papers receiving 574 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Cognitive Neuroscience 287
- Psychiatry and Mental health 112
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 81
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 65
- Behavioral Neuroscience 63
Countries citing papers authored by Ngoc Jade Thai
This map shows the geographic impact of Ngoc Jade Thai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ngoc Jade Thai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ngoc Jade Thai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ngoc Jade Thai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ngoc Jade Thai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ngoc Jade Thai. The network helps show where Ngoc Jade Thai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ngoc Jade Thai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ngoc Jade Thai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ngoc Jade Thai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ngoc Jade Thai. Ngoc Jade Thai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Ngoc Jade Thai
Ngoc Jade Thai is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 33 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (63 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (287 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (112 citations). Ngoc Jade Thai has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stefano Seri, Olivia Longe, Antonella Cerquiglini, Gina Rippon, Carl Senior, Georgina Russell, Marcus R. Munafò, J.C. Brooks, Stafford L. Lightman and Konstantinos Kalafatakis. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.