Ngai‐Ling Sum
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 0.5%
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Political and Economic history of UK and US
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Political Economy and Marxism 6
- Political theory and Gramsci 4
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 3
- Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism 3
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 2
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 3
Ngai‐Ling Sum
35 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Urban Studies 377
- Political Science and International Relations 604
- Finance 201
- Public Administration 68
- Development 70
Countries citing papers authored by Ngai‐Ling Sum
This map shows the geographic impact of Ngai‐Ling Sum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ngai‐Ling Sum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ngai‐Ling Sum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ngai‐Ling Sum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ngai‐Ling Sum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ngai‐Ling Sum. The network helps show where Ngai‐Ling Sum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ngai‐Ling Sum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 329 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 277 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 136 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 109 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 75 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 74 | |
| 7 | Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in their Place | 2007 | 71 |
| 8 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 65 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 11 |
About Ngai‐Ling Sum
Ngai‐Ling Sum is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (6 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Political theory and Gramsci (4 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (3 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (2 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (377 citations), Political Science and International Relations (604 citations), Finance (201 citations), Public Administration (68 citations) and Development (70 citations). Ngai‐Ling Sum has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Bob Jessop and Ngai Pun. Their work appears in journals such as New Political Economy, Critical Policy Studies, Critical Asian Studies, Distinktion Journal of Social Theory and Economy and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.