N.F.T. Arts

726 citations
27 papers · 483 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

N.F.T. Arts

27 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

N.F.T. Arts
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 113
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 231
  • Developmental Biology 25
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Pharmacy 22
Replace M. Y. Divon with:
M. Y. Divon United States
B.A. Peretz Israel
Louis Bartoshesky United States
A Kurjak Croatia
Ming‐Neng Yeh United States
R. Steldinger Germany
L. Pijpers Netherlands
G. Boog France
Nataliya Yuskiv Canada
J. Drescher Germany
N.F.T. Arts relative to M. Y. Divon United States M. Y. Divon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
M. Y. Divon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.F.T. Arts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.F.T. Arts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.F.T. Arts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.F.T. Arts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.F.T. Arts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.F.T. Arts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.F.T. Arts. The network helps show where N.F.T. Arts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.F.T. Arts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.F.T. Arts Line = papers co-authored together N.F.T. Arts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196163
2 198839
3 198834
4 198832
5 199025
6 198824
7 198823
8 198923
9 197119
10 198818
11 198518
12 199017
13 196117
14 198915
15 198614
16 198712
17 198812
18 198612
19 198711
20 198511

About N.F.T. Arts

N.F.T. Arts is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (8 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (5 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (4 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers) and Bone and Dental Protein Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (113 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (231 citations), Developmental Biology (25 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Pharmacy (22 citations). N.F.T. Arts has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herman P. van Geijn, Jozien T. J. Brons, F.J.M. Caron, E.E. van Woerden, J.M. Swartjes, A.H.M. Lohman, Chris J.L.M. Meijer, Piet F. Dijkstra, N. Exalto and Hans J. van der Harten. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Placenta, Prenatal Diagnosis and Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact