Ney Rafael Sêcco
- Computational Mechanics top 5%
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joaquim R. R. A. MartinsGaetan K. KenwayCharles A. MaderPing HeKarthikeyan DuraisamyJohn JasaFlávio J. SilvestreJohn T. Hwang
- Topics
- Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies (10 papers)Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (5 papers)Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Ney Rafael Sêcco
15 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Computational Mechanics 218
- Aerospace Engineering 188
- Global and Planetary Change 151
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 64
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 52
Countries citing papers authored by Ney Rafael Sêcco
This map shows the geographic impact of Ney Rafael Sêcco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ney Rafael Sêcco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ney Rafael Sêcco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ney Rafael Sêcco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ney Rafael Sêcco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ney Rafael Sêcco. The network helps show where Ney Rafael Sêcco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ney Rafael Sêcco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ney Rafael Sêcco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ney Rafael Sêcco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ney Rafael Sêcco. Ney Rafael Sêcco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 |
About Ney Rafael Sêcco
Ney Rafael Sêcco is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Global and Planetary Change and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 15 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies (10 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (5 papers) and Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (218 citations), Aerospace Engineering (188 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (52 citations). Ney Rafael Sêcco has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Gaetan K. Kenway, Charles A. Mader, Ping He, Karthikeyan Duraisamy, John Jasa, Flávio J. Silvestre, John T. Hwang and Kristian Amadori. Their work appears in journals such as AIAA Journal, Journal of Aircraft and The Aeronautical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.