Neville Board
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gideon A. CaplanNicholas BrennanAnn BrownJohn A. WardPhilip CroweDiane WatsonTegwen HowellB. Aliprandi‐Costa
- Topics
- Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Geriatrics and GerontologyCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Journals
- Age and AgeingThe Medical Journal of AustraliaAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Neville Board
11 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- General Health Professions 216
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 117
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 91
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 91
- Economics and Econometrics 83
Countries citing papers authored by Neville Board
This map shows the geographic impact of Neville Board's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neville Board with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neville Board more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neville Board
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neville Board. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neville Board. The network helps show where Neville Board may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neville Board
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neville Board. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neville Board based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neville Board. Neville Board is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | Implementation guide for surveillance of clostridium difficile infection | 11 |
| 4 | Implementation guide for surveillance of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 110 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 187 |
About Neville Board
Neville Board is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health Information Management and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (117 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (91 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (25 citations). Neville Board has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Gideon A. Caplan, Nicholas Brennan, Ann Brown, John A. Ward, Philip Crowe, Diane Watson, Tegwen Howell, B. Aliprandi‐Costa, Greg Gamble and Derek P. Chew. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, The Medical Journal of Australia and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.