Neil R. Cooper

151 papers receiving 8.6k citations

Neil R. Cooper's Hit Papers

Complement activation by beta-amyloid in Alzheimer disease. 1992 · 668 citations
6680+11+22Years since publication200400600

Peers

Neil R. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Immunology 4.7k
  • Hematology 1.5k
  • Genetics 1.3k
  • Neurology 958
  • Biological Psychiatry 154
Replace Nancy Hogg with:
Nancy Hogg United Kingdom
Herbert C. Morse United States
René A. W. van Lier Netherlands
Joseph H. Phillips United States
Stephen L. Nutt Australia
John Atkinson United States
Chikao Morimoto United States
Gary A. Koretzky United States
Kazuo Sugamura Japan
Günter J. Hämmerling Germany
Neil R. Cooper relative to Nancy Hogg United Kingdom Nancy Hogg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Nancy Hogg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil R. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil R. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil R. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil R. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil R. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil R. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil R. Cooper. The network helps show where Neil R. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil R. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil R. Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Neil R. Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Complement activation by beta-amyloid in Alzheimer disease.
Hit paper breakdown →
1992668
2 1985400
3 1993341
4 1985283
5 1981268
6 1987258
7 1998217
8 1997216
9 1976208
10 1971198
11 1975181
12 1975179
13 1970157
14 1989151
15 1981150
16 2001148
17 2001131
18 1990131
19 1985128
20 1979127

About Neil R. Cooper

Neil R. Cooper is a scholar working on Immunology, Hematology, Oncology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 155 papers that have together received 9.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complement system in diseases (64 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (26 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (23 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (23 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (23 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (14 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (11 papers) and Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (4.7k citations), Hematology (1.5k citations), Genetics (1.3k citations), Neurology (958 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (154 citations). Neil R. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Glen R. Nemerow, Bonnie M. Bradt, Robert J. Ziccardi, Hans J. Müller‐Eberhard, Michael B. A. Oldstone, Dawn Nowlin, Andrea J. Tenner, Fred C. Jensen, Raymond M. Welsh and Scott D. Webster. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Journal of Virology and Molecular Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact