Neil F. Haley
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Materials Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Michael FichtnerMichael R. DettyRobert J. ClemensEdward C. TaylorJian YuEdward F. ElslagerHuw M. L. DaviesHenry R. Luss
- Topics
- Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (6 papers)Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (5 papers)Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Medicinal ChemistryThe Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Neil F. Haley
26 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Organic Chemistry 213
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 64
- Materials Chemistry 58
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 44
- Molecular Biology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Neil F. Haley
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil F. Haley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil F. Haley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil F. Haley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil F. Haley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil F. Haley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil F. Haley. The network helps show where Neil F. Haley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil F. Haley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil F. Haley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil F. Haley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil F. Haley. Neil F. Haley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Neil F. Haley
Neil F. Haley is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (6 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (5 papers) and Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (33 citations), Organic Chemistry (213 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (44 citations). Neil F. Haley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Fichtner, Michael R. Detty, Robert J. Clemens, Edward C. Taylor, Jian Yu, Edward F. Elslager, Huw M. L. Davies, Henry R. Luss, Steven L. Bender and D. H. WADSWORTH. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.