Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Neil D. Jones Neil D. Jones (= 1×)
peers
Mark N. Wegman
Countries citing papers authored by Neil D. Jones
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil D. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil D. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil D. Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil D. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil D. Jones. The network helps show where Neil D. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil D. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil D. Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil D. Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Neil D. Jones. Neil D. Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jones, Neil D.. (2016). Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
4.
Jones, Neil D.. (2016). Constructing comparable standars of communicative language competence: the experience of two European projects. 27(1). 39–57.1 indexed citations
Jones, Neil D.. (1995). Special Address: MIX ten years after.. 24–38.1 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Neil D.. (1994). Program Speedups in Theory and Practice.. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 595–602.1 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Neil D.. (1991). Efficient Algebraic Operations on Programs. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 393–420.5 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Neil D.. (1990). Proceedings of the third European symposium on programming on ESOP '90.1 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Neil D.. (1990). ESOP '90 : 3rd European Symposium on Programming, Copenhagen, Denmark, May 15-18, 1990, proceedings. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
14.
Bjørner, Dines, et al.. (1988). Partial evaluation and mixed computation : proceedings of the IFIP TC2 Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Mixed Computation, Gammel Avernæs, Denmark, 18-24 October, 1987. Elsevier eBooks.2 indexed citations
15.
Bjørner, Dines, Neil D. Jones, & A. P. Ershov. (1988). Partial Evaluation and Mixed Computation: Proceedings of the IFIP TC2 Workshop, Gammel Avernaes, Denmark, 18-24 Oct., 1987. Elsevier eBooks.36 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Neil D. & Alan Mycroft. (1984). Stepwise Development of Operational and Denotational Semantics for Prolog.. 281–288.44 indexed citations
17.
Muchnick, Steven S. & Neil D. Jones. (1981). Program Flow Analysis: Theory and Application.198 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.