Neil Angus

21 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Neil Angus
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Research and Theory 17
  • Family Practice 23
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Rehabilitation 41
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 131
Replace Mary D. Bondmass with:
Mary D. Bondmass United States
Marguerite Daus United States
Anita Kärner Sweden
Lorraine M. Thirsk Canada
Sue Penque United States
Elizabeth Chin United States
Margrét Hrönn Svavarsdóttir Iceland
Chiung‐Jung Wu Australia
Li‐Hong Wan China
Gianluca Conte Italy
Neil Angus relative to Mary D. Bondmass United States Mary D. Bondmass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Mary D. Bondmass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Angus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Angus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Angus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Angus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Angus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Angus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Angus. The network helps show where Neil Angus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Angus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Angus Line = papers co-authored together Neil Angus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201168
2 201339
3 199937
4 200028
5 201321
6 202020
7 200020
8 202018
9 200118
10 202015
11 201013
12 202010
13 200110
14 20115
15 20214
16 20102
17 20012
18 20211
19 20201
20 20191

About Neil Angus

Neil Angus is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (17 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Rehabilitation (41 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (131 citations). Neil Angus has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J Leslie, William Lauder, William Reynolds, Julie Blair, David R. Thompson, J. Allen Scott, Pat Thomson, Patricia Thomson, Gordon F. Rushworth and W. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Rural and Remote Health, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing and Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact