Neda Sarafrazi

520 citations
7 papers · 192 indexed · h-index 6

Neda Sarafrazi

7 papers receiving 186 citations

Peers

Neda Sarafrazi
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Pharmacy 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 115
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Physiology 59
Replace Hinrich Köhler with:
Hinrich Köhler Germany
Evangelia Fappa Greece
Cria O. Gregory United States
Ruchi S. Doshi United States
Suzanne Cuda United States
Verónica Vázquez‐Velázquez Mexico
Jessica Garay United States
Nicholas Jackson United States
Daniela Lopes Gomes Brazil
Linda Gillis Canada
Neda Sarafrazi relative to Hinrich Köhler Germany Hinrich Köhler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Hinrich Köhler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neda Sarafrazi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neda Sarafrazi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neda Sarafrazi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neda Sarafrazi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neda Sarafrazi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neda Sarafrazi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neda Sarafrazi. The network helps show where Neda Sarafrazi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Neda Sarafrazi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neda Sarafrazi Line = papers co-authored together Neda Sarafrazi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 20227
2 202132
3
Waist Circumference Measurement Methodology Study: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2016.
201919
4
Attempts to Lose Weight Among Adults in the United States, 2013-2016.
201880
5
Perception of weight status in U.S. children and adolescents aged 8-15 years, 2005-2012.
201441
6
Perception of Weight Status in U.S. Children and Adolescents Aged 8-15 Years, 2005-2012. NCHS Data Brief. Number 158.
201412
7 20111

About Neda Sarafrazi

Neda Sarafrazi is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (3 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (1 paper), Nutrition and Health in Aging (1 paper), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (1 paper) and Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (56 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (115 citations) and Clinical Psychology (70 citations). Neda Sarafrazi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Crescent B. Martin, Cynthia L. Ogden, Kirsten Herrick, Jeffery P. Hughes, Ryne Paulose‐Ram, Vicki L. Burt, Lori G. Borrud, Bryan Stierman, Jack A. Yanovski and Craig M. Hales. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, The FASEB Journal and Pediatric Obesity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026