1.2k total citations 8 papers, 349 citations indexed
About
Nebojša Zelič is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Health.
According to data from OpenAlex, Nebojša Zelič has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 349 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 3 papers in Philosophy and 1 paper in Health. Recurrent topics in Nebojša Zelič's work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). Nebojša Zelič is often cited by papers focused on Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). Nebojša Zelič collaborates with scholars based in Croatia, United Kingdom and Spain. Nebojša Zelič's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities and Croatian Journal of Philosophy.
This map shows the geographic impact of Nebojša Zelič's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nebojša Zelič with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nebojša Zelič more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nebojša Zelič. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nebojša Zelič. The network helps show where Nebojša Zelič may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.