Neal Prakash
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 3
- Nerve injury and regeneration 3
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 3
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
- Biophysics top 10%
-
- Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques 4
-
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 4
-
- Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 3
- Co-authors
- Ron D. FrostigJohn G. FlanaganJonas FrisénPierre VanderhaeghenQiang LüShyam SrinivasYonghua ZhaoZhongping Chen
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenRussia
In The Last Decade
Neal Prakash
22 papers receiving 815 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Developmental Neuroscience 141
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 379
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
- Biophysics 37
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
Countries citing papers authored by Neal Prakash
This map shows the geographic impact of Neal Prakash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neal Prakash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neal Prakash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neal Prakash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neal Prakash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neal Prakash. The network helps show where Neal Prakash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neal Prakash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 2 | Intrinsic brain activity changes associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer: a pilot longitudinal study | 2019 | 1 |
| 3 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 130 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 155 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 43 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 102 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 91 |
About Neal Prakash
Neal Prakash is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (141 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (379 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (153 citations). Neal Prakash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ron D. Frostig, John G. Flanagan, Jonas Frisén, Pierre Vanderhaeghen, Qiang Lü, Shyam Srinivas, Yonghua Zhao, Zhongping Chen, J. Stuart Nelson and Arthur W. Toga. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.