Neal Oxenhandler
Impact in
-
- Art, Politics, and Modernism
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Papers in
-
- Historical and Modern Theater Studies 5
- Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics 3
-
- Spanish Literature and Culture Studies 3
- French Literature and Criticism 2
- French Literature and Poetry 2
- French Literature and Critical Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Vivian Sobchack (1 shared paper)Loïs Oppenheim (1 shared paper)Derek Coltman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Film Quarterly (3 papers)New Literary History (2 papers)SubStance (2 papers)Contemporary Literature (2 papers)L'esprit créateur (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Neal Oxenhandler
11 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 21
- Literature and Literary Theory 26
- Philosophy 18
- Music 5
- Cultural Studies 13
Countries citing papers authored by Neal Oxenhandler
This map shows the geographic impact of Neal Oxenhandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neal Oxenhandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neal Oxenhandler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neal Oxenhandler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neal Oxenhandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neal Oxenhandler. The network helps show where Neal Oxenhandler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Neal Oxenhandler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 113 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1958 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1952 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 14 | French literary criticism : the basis of judgment | 1966 | 0 |
| 15 | 1968 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1954 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1958 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1962 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 0 |
About Neal Oxenhandler
Neal Oxenhandler is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema History and Criticism (6 papers), Historical and Modern Theater Studies (5 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (3 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), French Literature and Poetry (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper) and French Literature and Critical Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (21 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), Philosophy (18 citations), Music (5 citations) and Cultural Studies (13 citations). Neal Oxenhandler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Vivian Sobchack, Loïs Oppenheim and Derek Coltman. Their work appears in journals such as Film Quarterly, New Literary History, SubStance, Contemporary Literature and L'esprit créateur.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.