Neal Osborn
- Oncology top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- David A. AhlquistTimothy R. ChurchShannon R. PayneMichael WandellDale C. SnoverDavid F. RansohoffThomas RöschRobert Day
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers)Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers)
- Journals
- GastroenterologyCancerGut
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyHungary
In The Last Decade
Neal Osborn
16 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Oncology 680
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 560
- Molecular Biology 517
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 380
- Cancer Research 361
Countries citing papers authored by Neal Osborn
This map shows the geographic impact of Neal Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neal Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neal Osborn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neal Osborn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neal Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neal Osborn. The network helps show where Neal Osborn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neal Osborn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neal Osborn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neal Osborn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neal Osborn. Neal Osborn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancerbreakdown → | 575 |
| 3 | 117 | |
| 4 | 89 | |
| 5 | 142 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Hemorrhoid Treatment in the Outpatient Gastroenterology Practice Using the O'Regan Disposable Hemorrhoid Banding System is Safe and Effective | 5 |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 132 | |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 157 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 18 |
About Neal Osborn
Neal Osborn is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Toxicology and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (560 citations), Oncology (680 citations) and Cancer Research (361 citations). Neal Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include David A. Ahlquist, Timothy R. Church, Shannon R. Payne, Michael Wandell, Dale C. Snover, David F. Ransohoff, Thomas Rösch, Robert Day, Catherine Lofton–Day and Esmeralda Castaños‐Vélez. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Cancer and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.