Fabian Model

3.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
42 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Fabian Model is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Fabian Model has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 12 papers in Molecular Biology and 10 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Fabian Model's work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (21 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers). Fabian Model is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (21 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers). Fabian Model collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Canada. Fabian Model's co-authors include Catherine Lofton–Day, Andrew Sledziewski, Christian Pilarsky, Theo deVos, Robert Grützmann, Stephen L. Hauser, Ludwig Kappos, Volker Liebenberg, Matthias Schuster and Reimo Tetzner and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Bioinformatics.

In The Last Decade

Fabian Model

40 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relaps... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fabian Model Switzerland 16 1.2k 1.1k 832 653 369 42 2.6k
Thomas Zwingers Germany 16 1.0k 0.8× 386 0.3× 1.2k 1.4× 446 0.7× 224 0.6× 30 2.2k
Silke Laßmann Germany 31 387 0.3× 1.2k 1.1× 1.1k 1.3× 431 0.7× 453 1.2× 87 2.7k
Huimin Geng United States 31 821 0.7× 1.9k 1.6× 768 0.9× 372 0.6× 820 2.2× 115 3.3k
Claudia Döring Germany 28 849 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 712 0.9× 686 1.1× 461 1.2× 82 2.3k
Delphine Loussouarn France 28 265 0.2× 976 0.9× 694 0.8× 574 0.9× 333 0.9× 76 2.3k
Florian Scherer Germany 12 536 0.4× 1.6k 1.4× 1.1k 1.3× 1.5k 2.3× 789 2.1× 45 3.5k
Chloé B. Steen United States 17 438 0.4× 1.7k 1.5× 1.2k 1.5× 851 1.3× 1.2k 3.3× 29 3.8k
Benoît Lhermitte France 18 336 0.3× 821 0.7× 710 0.9× 647 1.0× 160 0.4× 77 2.5k
Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez Spain 29 252 0.2× 1.2k 1.1× 1.5k 1.8× 637 1.0× 844 2.3× 181 3.9k
Andrew M. Donson United States 35 290 0.2× 1.7k 1.5× 632 0.8× 536 0.8× 462 1.3× 112 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Fabian Model

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fabian Model's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabian Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabian Model more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fabian Model

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabian Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabian Model. The network helps show where Fabian Model may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fabian Model

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fabian Model. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fabian Model based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fabian Model. Fabian Model is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burton, Barbara K., Deepa Rajan, Simon A. Jones, et al.. (2025). An Intravenous Brain-Penetrant Enzyme Therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis II. New England Journal of Medicine. 394(1). 39–50.
2.
Rouzic, Erwan Muros‐Le, Stefan Braune, Arnfin Bergmann, et al.. (2024). Five-year efficacy outcomes of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: A propensity-matched comparison of the OPERA studies with other disease-modifying therapies in real-world lines of treatments. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16. 2699787795–2699787795. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hauser, Stephen L., Amit Bar‐Or, Martin S. Weber, et al.. (2023). Association of Higher Ocrelizumab Exposure With Reduced Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation. 10(2). 28 indexed citations
6.
Hauser, Stephen L., Ludwig Kappos, Douglas L. Arnold, et al.. (2020). Five years of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 95(13). e1854–e1867. 106 indexed citations
7.
Kappos, Ludwig, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Gavin Giovannoni, et al.. (2020). Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Neurology. 77(9). 1132–1132. 344 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Kappos, Ludwig, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Gavin Giovannoni, et al.. (2019). Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hauser, Stephen L., Ludwig Kappos, Xavier Montalbán, et al.. (2019). Long-Term Reduction in 48-Week Confirmed Disability Progression After 5 Years of Ocrelizumab Treatment in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (P3.2-054). Neurology. 92(15_supplement). 1 indexed citations
10.
Arnold, Douglas L., Gavin Giovannoni, Hans‐Peter Hartung, et al.. (2019). Reduced Rate of Brain Atrophy in Patients With PPMS Receiving Ocrelizumab Earlier and Continuously Versus Those Initiating Ocrelizumab Later: Results of ORATORIO 5-Year Follow-Up (P3.2-042). Neurology. 92(15_supplement). 1 indexed citations
11.
Kletzl, Heidemarie, Ekaterina Gibiansky, Claire Petry, et al.. (2019). Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (N4.001). Neurology. 92(15_supplement). 12 indexed citations
14.
Naismith, Robert T., Mark Cascione, Luigi Maria Edoardo Grimaldi, et al.. (2017). Preliminary Results of the OPERA I and OPERA II Open-Label Extension Study (S31.004). Neurology. 88(16_supplement). 2 indexed citations
16.
Payne, Shannon R., Jürgen Serth, Martin Schostak, et al.. (2009). DNA methylation biomarkers of prostate cancer: Confirmation of candidates and evidence urine is the most sensitive body fluid for non‐invasive detection. The Prostate. 69(12). 1257–1269. 83 indexed citations
17.
Grützmann, Robert, Béla Molnár, Christian Pilarsky, et al.. (2008). Sensitive Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Peripheral Blood by Septin 9 DNA Methylation Assay. PLoS ONE. 3(11). e3759–e3759. 304 indexed citations
18.
Model, Fabian, Neal Osborn, David A. Ahlquist, et al.. (2007). Identification and Validation of Colorectal Neoplasia–Specific Methylation Markers for Accurate Classification of Disease. Molecular Cancer Research. 5(2). 153–163. 45 indexed citations
19.
Lofton–Day, Catherine, Fabian Model, Theo deVos, et al.. (2007). DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clinical Chemistry. 54(2). 414–423. 385 indexed citations
20.
Martens, John W.M., Inko Nimmrich, Thomas Koenig, et al.. (2005). Association of DNA Methylation of Phosphoserine Aminotransferase with Response to Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Breast Cancer. Cancer Research. 65(10). 4101–4117. 102 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026