Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Integrated Surface Database: Recent Developments and Partnerships
2011430 citationsAdam Smith, Neal Lott et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Neal Lott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neal Lott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neal Lott more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neal Lott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neal Lott. The network helps show where Neal Lott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neal Lott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neal Lott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neal Lott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Neal Lott. Neal Lott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Adam, et al.. (2011). The Integrated Surface Database: Recent Developments and Partnerships. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 92(6). 704–708.430 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Herring, David, et al.. (2010). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Services Portal: A New Centralized Resource for Distributed Climate Information.1 indexed citations
4.
Lott, Neal, et al.. (2008). The Integrated Surface Database: Partnerships and progress [presentation].1 indexed citations
5.
Lott, Neal, et al.. (2007). Web Services at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.16 indexed citations
6.
Reid, George C., et al.. (2007). GIS Services, Visualization Products, and Interoperability at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). AGUFM. 2007.4 indexed citations
7.
Wilcox, S., R. George, William Marion, et al.. (2007). Completing Production of the Updated National Solar Radiation Database for the United States. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).14 indexed citations
8.
Worley, Steven J., Scott D. Woodruff, Richard W. Reynolds, Sandra J. Lubker, & Neal Lott. (2005). ICOADS release 2.1 data and products. International Journal of Climatology. 25(7). 823–842.337 indexed citations
9.
Levinson, David, et al.. (2005). Hurricane Katrina: A Climatological Perspective.57 indexed citations
10.
Lott, Neal, et al.. (2005). TRACKING AND EVALUATING U.S. BILLION DOLLAR WEATHER DISASTERS, 1980-2005.48 indexed citations
11.
Lott, Neal, et al.. (2003). A climatology of 1980-2003 extreme weather and climate events.51 indexed citations
12.
Lott, Neal, et al.. (2002). The Development of a U.S. climatology of extreme ice loads.11 indexed citations
13.
Lott, Neal, et al.. (2001). The FCC integrated surface hourly database : a new resource of global climate data.39 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.