Naveen Jain
- Physiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Àmarjit SinghChandrashekhar S. PatilVijay P. SinghS. K. KulkarniVijay Pal SinghSachin KulkarniHarvey R. HerschmanTomo‐o Ishikawa
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers)Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (13 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Naveen Jain
49 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Physiology 563
- Molecular Biology 496
- Pharmacology 335
- Oncology 266
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 257
Countries citing papers authored by Naveen Jain
This map shows the geographic impact of Naveen Jain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naveen Jain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naveen Jain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naveen Jain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naveen Jain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naveen Jain. The network helps show where Naveen Jain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naveen Jain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naveen Jain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naveen Jain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naveen Jain. Naveen Jain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Development and characterization of targeting ligand decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for targeting potential to cancer cells | 0 |
| 5 | 218 | |
| 6 | Knee injuries in elite professional footballers: the findings of one English Premier League team | 1 |
| 7 | MRSA & MSSA screening for elective lower limb arthroplasty | 1 |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | 105 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 72 | |
| 16 | 102 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 69 | |
| 20 | 121 |
About Naveen Jain
Naveen Jain is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (13 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (563 citations), Pharmacology (335 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (49 citations). Naveen Jain has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Àmarjit Singh, Chandrashekhar S. Patil, Vijay P. Singh, S. K. Kulkarni, Vijay Pal Singh, Sachin Kulkarni, Harvey R. Herschman, Tomo‐o Ishikawa, Sukhjeet Singh and Samuel A. Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Nature Communications and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.