Naveen Gadapa
- Neurology top 10%
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research 2
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 2
- Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications 1
-
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management 3
-
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research 2
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 2
- Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications 1
-
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging 2
-
- AI in cancer detection 2
-
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 1
-
- Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus 1
- Co-authors
- Yves VandermeerenNagui AntounEamon DolanJean‐Claude BaronHans Rolf JägerAndré PeetersPatrice LalouxSimone M. Gregoire
- Partner nations
- United KingdomLithuaniaFrance
In The Last Decade
Naveen Gadapa
6 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Neurology 134
- Health Informatics 10
- Epidemiology 102
- Neurology 14
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 36
Countries citing papers authored by Naveen Gadapa
This map shows the geographic impact of Naveen Gadapa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naveen Gadapa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naveen Gadapa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naveen Gadapa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naveen Gadapa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naveen Gadapa. The network helps show where Naveen Gadapa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naveen Gadapa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 138 | |
| 6 | Silent ischemic lesions in patients with acute symptomatic spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship to lobar microbleeds and clinically probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy | 2011 | 2 |
About Naveen Gadapa
Naveen Gadapa is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 6 papers that have together received 185 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (2 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (2 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (1 paper) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (134 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations) and Epidemiology (102 citations). Naveen Gadapa has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Lithuania and France. Frequent co-authors include Yves Vandermeeren, Nagui Antoun, Eamon Dolan, Jean‐Claude Baron, Hans Rolf Jäger, André Peeters, Patrice Laloux, Simone M. Gregoire, David J. Werring and Andreas Charidimou. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, European Radiology, Practical Neurology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Future Healthcare Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.