Nathaniel S. Pope
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Genetics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Shalene JhaRodolfo JafféNishanta RajakarunaVera Lúcia Imperatriz-FonsecaAlfredo Romero CastillaWilliam E. PetermanJaret C. DanielsJulianna K. Wilson
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (18 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel S. Pope
29 papers receiving 871 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 659
- Insect Science 440
- Genetics 350
- Plant Science 299
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 161
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel S. Pope
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel S. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel S. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel S. Pope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel S. Pope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel S. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel S. Pope. The network helps show where Nathaniel S. Pope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel S. Pope
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel S. Pope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel S. Pope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel S. Pope. Nathaniel S. Pope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 148 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | Diversity and Soil-Tissue Elemental Relations of Vascular Plants of Callahan Mine | 5 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | Vascular plants of adjacent serpentine and granite outcrops on the Deer Isles, Maine, USA | 6 |
About Nathaniel S. Pope
Nathaniel S. Pope is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (440 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (659 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (161 citations). Nathaniel S. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shalene Jha, Rodolfo Jaffé, Nishanta Rajakaruna, Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca, Alfredo Romero Castilla, William E. Peterman, Jaret C. Daniels, Julianna K. Wilson, Jamie Ellis and Emily A. May. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.