Nathaniel R. Shaffer
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Geophysics top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. E. StarrettSimon BlouinD. SaumonScott BaalrudJérôme DaligaultValentin V. KarasievS. X. HuV. N. Goncharov
- Topics
- High-pressure geophysics and materials (15 papers)Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers)Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel R. Shaffer
23 papers receiving 254 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 141
- Geophysics 104
- Mechanics of Materials 68
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 67
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 60
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel R. Shaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel R. Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel R. Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel R. Shaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel R. Shaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel R. Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel R. Shaffer. The network helps show where Nathaniel R. Shaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel R. Shaffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel R. Shaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel R. Shaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel R. Shaffer. Nathaniel R. Shaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Nathaniel R. Shaffer
Nathaniel R. Shaffer is a scholar working on Geophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (15 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (104 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (67 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (141 citations). Nathaniel R. Shaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. E. Starrett, Simon Blouin, D. Saumon, Scott Baalrud, Jérôme Daligault, Valentin V. Karasiev, S. X. Hu, V. N. Goncharov, M. Sherlock and Sanat Kumar Tiwari. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.