A. Colaïtis

1.1k total citations
46 papers, 589 citations indexed

About

A. Colaïtis is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Colaïtis has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 589 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 28 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 22 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in A. Colaïtis's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (37 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (28 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (14 papers). A. Colaïtis is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (37 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (28 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (14 papers). A. Colaïtis collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. A. Colaïtis's co-authors include V. T. Tikhonchuk, Guillaume Duchateau, X. Ribeyre, R. K. Follett, J. P. Palastro, D. Turnbull, V. N. Goncharov, D. H. Froula, D. Batani and D. J. Strozzi and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Journal of Computational Physics.

In The Last Decade

A. Colaïtis

41 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Colaïtis France 16 439 300 291 109 103 46 589
Taisuke Nagayama United States 18 333 0.8× 347 1.2× 332 1.1× 112 1.0× 155 1.5× 53 634
D. R. Farley United States 9 335 0.8× 186 0.6× 142 0.5× 110 1.0× 89 0.9× 21 453
E. T. Gumbrell United Kingdom 15 373 0.8× 274 0.9× 322 1.1× 116 1.1× 55 0.5× 34 567
E. Kroupp Israel 16 509 1.2× 346 1.2× 285 1.0× 88 0.8× 71 0.7× 66 670
A. Sgattoni Italy 16 565 1.3× 371 1.2× 338 1.2× 165 1.5× 59 0.6× 30 652
Matthew Weis United States 13 323 0.7× 114 0.4× 107 0.4× 100 0.9× 101 1.0× 34 425
T. Caillaud France 12 338 0.8× 296 1.0× 320 1.1× 73 0.7× 27 0.3× 28 558
M. N. Quinn United Kingdom 15 565 1.3× 407 1.4× 365 1.3× 189 1.7× 65 0.6× 29 724
J. M. Foster United Kingdom 10 253 0.6× 364 1.2× 372 1.3× 77 0.7× 39 0.4× 23 560
J. K. Nash United States 16 305 0.7× 445 1.5× 516 1.8× 69 0.6× 52 0.5× 30 708

Countries citing papers authored by A. Colaïtis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Colaïtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Colaïtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Colaïtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Colaïtis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Colaïtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Colaïtis. The network helps show where A. Colaïtis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Colaïtis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Colaïtis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Colaïtis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Colaïtis. A. Colaïtis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Breil, J., et al.. (2025). 3D mesh regularization within an ALE code using a weighted line sweeping method. Computers & Fluids. 292. 106591–106591.
2.
Follett, R. K., I. V. Igumenshchev, A. Colaïtis, et al.. (2025). Modeling cross-beam energy transfer with sector ray tracing. Physics of Plasmas. 32(2). 1 indexed citations
3.
Follett, R. K., A. Colaïtis, I. V. Igumenshchev, et al.. (2025). An experimentally informed design process for future inertial confinement fusion facilities. Physics of Plasmas. 32(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
Froula, D. H., C. Dorrer, A. Colaïtis, et al.. (2025). A future of inertial confinement fusion without laser-plasma instabilities. Physics of Plasmas. 32(5).
5.
Canaud, B., et al.. (2024). Solid-to-plasma transition of polystyrene induced by a nanosecond laser pulse within the context of inertial confinement fusion. Physical review. E. 109(6). 65207–65207. 2 indexed citations
6.
Barlow, Duncan, A. Colaïtis, M. J. Rosenberg, et al.. (2024). Optimization Methodology of Polar Direct-Drive Illumination for the National Ignition Facility. Physical Review Letters. 133(17). 175101–175101.
7.
Colaïtis, A., R. K. Follett, C. Dorrer, et al.. (2023). Exploration of cross-beam energy transfer mitigation constraints for designing an ignition-scale direct-drive inertial confinement fusion driver. Physics of Plasmas. 30(8). 5 indexed citations
8.
Batani, D., A. Colaïtis, F. Consoli, et al.. (2023). Future for inertial-fusion energy in Europe: a roadmap. High Power Laser Science and Engineering. 11. 22 indexed citations
9.
Follett, R. K., et al.. (2023). Ray-based cross-beam energy transfer modeling for broadband lasers. Physics of Plasmas. 30(4). 7 indexed citations
10.
Colaïtis, A., et al.. (2023). Hot electron scaling for two-plasmon decay in ICF plasmas. Physics of Plasmas. 30(4). 3 indexed citations
11.
Colaïtis, A., et al.. (2022). 3D Monte-Carlo model to study the transport of hot electrons in the context of inertial confinement fusion. Part II. Matter and Radiation at Extremes. 7(6). 6 indexed citations
12.
Colaïtis, A., et al.. (2022). 3D Monte-Carlo model to study the transport of hot electrons in the context of inertial confinement fusion. Part I. Matter and Radiation at Extremes. 7(6). 9 indexed citations
13.
Follett, R. K., A. Colaïtis, D. Turnbull, D. H. Froula, & J. P. Palastro. (2022). Validation of ray-based cross-beam energy transfer models. Physics of Plasmas. 29(11). 6 indexed citations
14.
Colaïtis, A., W. Theobald, A. Casner, et al.. (2021). Experimental characterization of hot-electron emission and shock dynamics in the context of the shock ignition approach to inertial confinement fusion. Physics of Plasmas. 28(10). 103302–103302. 9 indexed citations
15.
Kirkwood, R. K., D. Turnbull, T. Chapman, et al.. (2018). A plasma amplifier to combine multiple beams at NIF. Physics of Plasmas. 25(5). 16 indexed citations
16.
Colaïtis, A., et al.. (2016). Influence of laser induced hot electrons on the threshold for shock ignition of fusion reactions. Physics of Plasmas. 23(7). 22 indexed citations
17.
Bertrand, Tanguy, Aymeric Spiga, Scot Rafkin, et al.. (2016). An intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Martian daytime convective boundary layer. 3 indexed citations
18.
Colaïtis, A., Guillaume Duchateau, Philippe Nicolaï, & V. T. Tikhonchuk. (2014). Towards modeling of nonlinear laser-plasma interactions with hydrocodes: The thick-ray approach. Physical Review E. 89(3). 33101–33101. 26 indexed citations
19.
Bertrand, Tanguy, Aymeric Spiga, Scot Rafkin, et al.. (2013). LMD - SwRI Martian Mesoscale Models Intercomparison for ExoMars Landing Site Characterization. EPSC. 1 indexed citations
20.
Millour, Ehouarn, F. Forget, Franck Lefèvre, et al.. (2012). The latest improvements in the LMD Global Climate Model and derived Mars Climate Database (version 5). cosp. 39. 1239. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026