Nathaniel M. Pearson

2.8k total citations
12 papers, 605 citations indexed

About

Nathaniel M. Pearson is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathaniel M. Pearson has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 605 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Nathaniel M. Pearson's work include Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). Nathaniel M. Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). Nathaniel M. Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Nathaniel M. Pearson's co-authors include Bruce T. Lahn, Karin Jegalian, Wenfeng Qian, Jianzhi Zhang, Calum J. Maclean, Wayne H. Knox, C. Hirlimann, Soojin V. Yi, Wen‐Hsiung Li and Ravinder K. Kanda and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Genetics, Nature Reviews Genetics and Genome Research.

In The Last Decade

Nathaniel M. Pearson

11 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Nathaniel M. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Molecular Biology 340
  • Genetics 230
  • Plant Science 106
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 93
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 90
Replace Carol S. Bookwalter with:
Carol S. Bookwalter United States
Xibin Yang China
Monique Marilley France
Hella Baumann Germany
Ilana M. Nodelman United States
Andrea Candelli Netherlands
Allen T. Christian United States
Arnon Henn Israel
Martin Turk Germany
Hirotaka Tanaka Japan
Carol S. Bookwalter United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Nathaniel M. Pearson
Nathaniel M. Pearson · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Nathaniel M. Pearson
Nathaniel M. Pearson · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel M. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel M. Pearson. The network helps show where Nathaniel M. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel M. Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel M. Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel M. Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel M. Pearson. Nathaniel M. Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2 13
3 3
4 1
5 227
6 32
7 12
8 25
9 160
10
The EUROGEM map of human chromosome 4.
1
11 34
12 92

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026