Nathan Shugg

829 total citations
3 papers, 10 citations indexed

About

Nathan Shugg is a scholar working on Surgery, Urology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Shugg has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 10 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Urology and 1 paper in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Nathan Shugg's work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper) and Genital Health and Disease (1 paper). Nathan Shugg is often cited by papers focused on Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper) and Genital Health and Disease (1 paper). Nathan Shugg collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Nathan Shugg's co-authors include Devang Desai, Amila Siriwardana, John Hempenstall, Prem Rashid, Alison Blatt and Jonathan Chambers and has published in prestigious journals such as Translational Andrology and Urology and Journal of Clinical Urology.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Shugg

2 papers receiving 10 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan Shugg Australia 2 9 8 8 1 3 10
Eleanor McAlees United Kingdom 3 10 1.1× 6 0.8× 10 1.3× 4 19
R. Bensaid France 2 14 1.6× 14 1.8× 9 1.1× 2 15
Ajnish Ghimire Nepal 2 5 0.6× 5 0.6× 5 0.6× 1 1.0× 5 10
Vijay Tyagi India 3 4 0.4× 7 0.9× 11 1.4× 6 14
Amaia Marí Hualde Spain 3 6 0.7× 4 0.5× 9 1.1× 10 14
Samuel Osei‐Nketiah Ghana 2 16 1.8× 8 1.0× 4 0.5× 2 18
Isaac Sunday Chukwu Nigeria 3 10 1.1× 4 0.5× 3 0.4× 8 13
Ahmed Ali United States 3 8 0.9× 4 0.5× 4 0.5× 5 15
André Caiado Portugal 2 5 0.6× 5 0.6× 3 0.4× 3 9
Hare Ram Ojha United Kingdom 2 4 0.4× 13 1.6× 14 1.8× 4 17

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Shugg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Shugg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Shugg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Shugg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Shugg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Shugg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Shugg. The network helps show where Nathan Shugg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Shugg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Shugg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Shugg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Shugg. Nathan Shugg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
2.
Shugg, Nathan, et al.. (2022). Prevalence and sequelae of penile lichen sclerosus in males presenting for circumcision in regional Australia: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Translational Andrology and Urology. 11(6). 780–785. 8 indexed citations
3.
Shugg, Nathan, et al.. (2020). Causes of delayed exploration of the acute scrotum in a regional tertiary centre. Journal of Clinical Urology. 14(6). 470–474. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026