Nathan Mitchell

2.1k citations
42 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Mitchell

39 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Nathan Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 762
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Pharmacy 76
  • General Health Professions 366
  • Internal Medicine 48
Replace Jared M. Tucker with:
Jared M. Tucker United States
Renee Smith United States
Katrina D. DuBose United States
Lyndal Bugeja Australia
Louise S. Jenkins United States
Michael Rotondi Canada
Rebecca M. Stanley Australia
Vegar Rangul Norway
Vicki Whittaker United Kingdom
Kristie J. Lancaster United States
Nathan Mitchell relative to Jared M. Tucker United States Jared M. Tucker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jared M. Tucker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Mitchell. The network helps show where Nathan Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017104
2 201093
3 201092
4 201081
5 201374
6 201173
7 200465
8 198263
9 201558
10 201357
11 201256
12 201455
13 201050
14 200948
15 200548
16 201847
17 202046
18 202043
19 201740
20 201539

About Nathan Mitchell

Nathan Mitchell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (23 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (762 citations), Applied Psychology (99 citations), Pharmacy (76 citations), General Health Professions (366 citations) and Internal Medicine (48 citations). Nathan Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Simone A. French, Lisa Harnack, Peter J. Hannan, Anne Gerlach, Julian Wolfson, Melanie M. Wall, Timothy L. Barnes, Traci L. Toomey, Robert W. Jeffery and Ericka M. Welsh. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Obesity, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health Nutrition and Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact