Nathan Lovejoy

3.7k citations
88 papers · 2.8k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Lovejoy

85 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Nathan Lovejoy
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.0k
  • Aquatic Science 1.1k
  • Paleontology 390
  • Ecology 601
  • Genetics 506
Replace Hernán López-Fernández with:
Hernán López-Fernández United States
Sébastien Lavoué Malaysia
Terry C. Grande United States
Gloria Arratia United States
Christine E. Thacker United States
Tomas Hrbek Brazil
Theodore W. Pietsch United States
Ron I. Eytan United States
Michael Tobler United States
Stuart C. Willis United States
Nathan Lovejoy relative to Hernán López-Fernández United States Hernán López-Fernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hernán López-Fernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Lovejoy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Lovejoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Lovejoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Lovejoy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Lovejoy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Lovejoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Lovejoy. The network helps show where Nathan Lovejoy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Lovejoy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Lovejoy Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Lovejoy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998178
2 2006170
3 1996144
4 2014136
5 2006126
6 201397
7 200093
8 200192
9 200585
10 201383
11 201476
12 200970
13 200669
14 201267
15 201764
16 200563
17 201158
18 201456
19 200454
20 200051

About Nathan Lovejoy

Nathan Lovejoy is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Paleontology and Genetics, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (54 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (48 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (26 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (21 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (13 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (13 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (7 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k citations), Aquatic Science (1.1k citations), Paleontology (390 citations), Ecology (601 citations) and Genetics (506 citations). Nathan Lovejoy has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include William G. R. Crampton, James S. Albert, Devin D. Bloom, Andrew Martin, Eldredge Bermingham, Nathan K. Lujan, Bruce B. Collette, Matthew A. Kolmann, Jonathan W. Armbruster and Hernán López-Fernández. Their work appears in journals such as Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Evolution and Molecular Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact