Nathan J. Lyons

13 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers

Nathan J. Lyons
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Earth-Surface Processes 66
  • Soil Science 87
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 104
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 133
  • Ecology 147
Replace L. Borgniet with:
L. Borgniet France
Ivano Rellini Italy
Márcio de Morisson Valeriano Brazil
Renée F. Brown United States
Jean Nabucet France
Mona Court‐Picon France
Ivan Barka Slovakia
Tibor Standovár Hungary
Victor V. Chepinoga Russia
Tanya J. Mason Australia
Nathan J. Lyons relative to L. Borgniet France L. Borgniet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
L. Borgniet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan J. Lyons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan J. Lyons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan J. Lyons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan J. Lyons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan J. Lyons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan J. Lyons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan J. Lyons. The network helps show where Nathan J. Lyons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan J. Lyons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan J. Lyons Line = papers co-authored together Nathan J. Lyons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1975144
2 202075
3 201168
4 201143
5 197534
6 202023
7 202223
8 201320
9 201519
10 201916
11 20137
12 20206
13 20204

About Nathan J. Lyons

Nathan J. Lyons is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Atmospheric Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (6 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (4 papers), Landslides and related hazards (3 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (2 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (2 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (2 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (2 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (66 citations), Soil Science (87 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (104 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (133 citations) and Ecology (147 citations). Nathan J. Lyons has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Beattie, N. M. Gasparini, Karl W. Wegmann, Helena Mitášová, James S. Albert, Jane K. Willenbring, Michael J. Starek, Pedro Val, Margery F. Overton and Russell S. Harmon. Their work appears in journals such as Earth Surface Dynamics, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, American Journal of Botany, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters and Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact