Nathan Hogaboom

22 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Nathan Hogaboom
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Occupational Therapy 47
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 157
  • Rehabilitation 49
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 42
Replace Ümüt Güzelküçük with:
Ümüt Güzelküçük Türkiye
Arthur Jason De Luigi United States
M McClelland United Kingdom
Afaf A. M. Shaheen Saudi Arabia
Ali H. Alnahdi Saudi Arabia
Zeliha Başkurt Türkiye
Natália Cristina de Oliveira Brazil
Leon Kaplan Israel
Keiji Fujino Japan
Caroline Nattrass Australia
Nathan Hogaboom relative to Ümüt Güzelküçük Türkiye Ümüt Güzelküçük's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Ümüt Güzelküçük · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Hogaboom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Hogaboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Hogaboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Hogaboom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Hogaboom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Hogaboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Hogaboom. The network helps show where Nathan Hogaboom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Hogaboom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Hogaboom Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Hogaboom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201830
2 201430
3 201627
4 202025
5 201725
6 201523
7 201717
8 201917
9 201915
10 202114
11 201613
12 201513
13 20218
14 20168
15 20138
16 20177
17 20206
18 20195
19 20165
20 20194

About Nathan Hogaboom

Nathan Hogaboom is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (15 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (10 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (4 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (2 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (47 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (157 citations), Rehabilitation (49 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (42 citations). Nathan Hogaboom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. Boninger, Lynn A. Worobey, Alicia M Koontz, M. Oyster, Gerard A. Malanga, Trevor A. Dyson‐Hudson, Bethlyn Houlihan, Allen W. Heinemann, Shivayogi V. Hiremath and Ursina Arnet. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Clinical Biomechanics, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact