Nathan G. Hale
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Psychology top 1%
- History top 1%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. KevlesGerald N. GrobDavid E. StannardSigmund FreudWilliam JamesJAMES J. PUTNAMErnest JonesSándor Ferenczi
- Topics
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (10 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Nathan G. Hale
15 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 213
- General Psychology 113
- History 99
- Philosophy 78
- Social Psychology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan G. Hale
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan G. Hale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan G. Hale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan G. Hale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan G. Hale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan G. Hale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan G. Hale. The network helps show where Nathan G. Hale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan G. Hale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan G. Hale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan G. Hale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan G. Hale. Nathan G. Hale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emotional Illness: How Families Can Help | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | The Rise and Crisis of Psychoanalysis in the United States: Freud and the Americans, 1917-1985 | 171 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 79 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | James Jackson Putnam and psychoanalysis | 18 |
| 19 | Boston miscellany of literature and fashion | 1 |
About Nathan G. Hale
Nathan G. Hale is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Museology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (10 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (113 citations), Clinical Psychology (213 citations) and History (99 citations). Nathan G. Hale has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Kevles, Gerald N. Grob, David E. Stannard, Sigmund Freud, William James, JAMES J. PUTNAM, Ernest Jones, Sándor Ferenczi, Morton Prince and Paul Roazen. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.