Nathan Cleven
Impact in
- Geophysics top 5%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Papers in
-
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 9
- earthquake and tectonic studies 6
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 6
-
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping 6
- Co-authors
- Shoufa Lin (5 shared papers)Wenjiao Xiao (4 shared papers)Junfeng Qu (1 shared paper)Songjian Ao (1 shared paper)Lianchang Zhang (1 shared paper)Bo Wan (1 shared paper)Brian F. Windley (1 shared paper)Chunming Han (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Tectonics (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1 paper)Gondwana Research (1 paper)Precambrian Research (1 paper)Ore Geology Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nathan Cleven
10 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Geophysics 615
- Artificial Intelligence 427
- Geochemistry and Petrology 53
- Geology 38
- Paleontology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Cleven
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Cleven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Cleven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Cleven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Cleven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Cleven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Cleven. The network helps show where Nathan Cleven may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Cleven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 351 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 |
About Nathan Cleven
Nathan Cleven is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Civil and Structural Engineering, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (9 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (6 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (6 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper), Elder Abuse and Neglect (1 paper) and Concrete and Cement Materials Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (615 citations), Artificial Intelligence (427 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (53 citations), Geology (38 citations) and Paleontology (40 citations). Nathan Cleven has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shoufa Lin, Wenjiao Xiao, Junfeng Qu, Songjian Ao, Lianchang Zhang, Bo Wan, Brian F. Windley, Chunming Han, Huaying Wu and Y. Shan. Their work appears in journals such as Tectonics, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Gondwana Research, Precambrian Research and Ore Geology Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.