Nathan Chan

555 citations
15 papers · 127 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Chan

13 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers

Nathan Chan
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 67
  • Communication 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 96
  • Gender Studies 16
  • Cultural Studies 10
Replace Naika Foroutan with:
Naika Foroutan Germany
Lauren Ila Misiaszek China
Fabian Virchow Germany
John Pollard United Kingdom
Javier Corrales
Robert Herzstein United States
Bartek Pytlas Germany
Jane Chapman United Kingdom
Isabel Bramsen Sweden
Johanna Meehan United States
Nathan Chan relative to Naika Foroutan Germany Naika Foroutan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Naika Foroutan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Chan. The network helps show where Nathan Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Chan Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Chan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202125
2 202125
3 202023
4 202213
5 202012
6 20208
7 20217
8 20245
9 20224
10
From Affirmative Action to Gig Economy: Racial Differences in the Support for California Propositions in the 2020 Election
20212
11 20251
12 20251
13 20211
14 20250
15 20250

About Nathan Chan

Nathan Chan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Social Capital and Networks (2 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (2 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (67 citations), Communication (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (96 citations), Gender Studies (16 citations) and Cultural Studies (10 citations). Nathan Chan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Vivien Leung, Natalie Masuoka, Benjamin W. Hoyt, Gabriele Magni, Jessica Lee and Jin X. Goh. Their work appears in journals such as Political Behavior, Perspectives on Politics, Political Research Quarterly, Politics and Religion and The Journal of Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact