Nathan Carlie

1.8k citations
55 papers · 1.5k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Carlie

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Nathan Carlie
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ceramics and Composites 443
  • Materials Chemistry 993
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.0k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 394
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 162
Replace Ashtosh Ganjoo with:
Ashtosh Ganjoo United States
Jeffrey M. Harbold United States
Fangteng Zhang China
C. Grivas United Kingdom
Aoxiang Lin China
V. D. Petrikov Russia
Xiuwei Fan China
Baris Kokuoz United States
Arnaud Royon France
I. Camlibel United States
Nathan Carlie relative to Ashtosh Ganjoo United States Ashtosh Ganjoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Ashtosh Ganjoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Carlie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Carlie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Carlie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Carlie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Carlie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Carlie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Carlie. The network helps show where Nathan Carlie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Carlie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Carlie Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Carlie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007137
2 2005110
3 200892
4 200786
5 201074
6 200973
7 200961
8 201056
9 201156
10 200655
11 200547
12 200846
13 200638
14 201037
15 201135
16 200934
17 200832
18 201031
19 200730
20 200730

About Nathan Carlie

Nathan Carlie is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ceramics and Composites, Computational Mechanics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase-change materials and chalcogenides (36 papers), Glass properties and applications (23 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (22 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (14 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (10 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (6 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (4 papers) and Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (443 citations), Materials Chemistry (993 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.0k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (394 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (162 citations). Nathan Carlie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Laëticia Petit, Anu Agarwal, Lionel C. Kimerling, Juejun Hu, Kathleen Richardson, Kathleen Richardson, K. Richardson, V. I. Tarasov, Ning-Ning Feng and M. Couzi. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Optical Materials, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact