Nathalie Prieto

25 papers receiving 443 citations

Hit Papers

Les professionnels de santé face à la pandémie de la mala...20202026202220242020100200300

Peers

Nathalie Prieto
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Clinical Psychology 341
  • General Health Professions 216
  • Social Psychology 78
  • Oncology 46
  • Sociology and Political Science 34
Replace Kris McGill with:
Kris McGill United Kingdom
Bridget Davis United Kingdom
Santo Imanuel Tonapa Taiwan
Chiara Manna Italy
Gabriele d’Ettorre Italy
Ice Septriani Saragih Indonesia
Claudia Foghi Italy
Sakti Oktaria Batubara Indonesia
Derik Yeager United States
Venke A. Johansen Norway
Nathalie Prieto relative to Kris McGill United Kingdom Kris McGill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Kris McGill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathalie Prieto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathalie Prieto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathalie Prieto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathalie Prieto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathalie Prieto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathalie Prieto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathalie Prieto. The network helps show where Nathalie Prieto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathalie Prieto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathalie Prieto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathalie Prieto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathalie Prieto. Nathalie Prieto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 0
4 2
5 2
6 8
7 11
8 1
9 3
10
Les professionnels de santé face à la pandémie de la maladie à coronavirus (COVID-19) : quels risques pour leur santé mentale ?breakdown →
315
11 10
12 6
13 17
14
[Treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder].
0
15
[What's the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)?]
3
16 18
17 22
18
Débriefing psychologique et intervention psychothérapique post-immédiate
3
19 8
20 3

About Nathalie Prieto

Nathalie Prieto is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (7 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (341 citations), General Health Professions (216 citations) and Occupational Therapy (22 citations). Nathalie Prieto has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Wissam El‐Hage, Philippe Birmes, Pierre Vidailhet, Bruno Étain, Anne Sauvaget, Antoine Yrondi, Paul Brunault, Bruno Aouizerate, Djamila Bennabi and É. Fakra. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026